ioeric added a comment. Please see comment from a previous patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D27054?id=79099#inline-234270). Generally, `AtomicChange` is a higher level of abstraction than `Replacement`, and we don't want users to deal with `Replacement` and the related errors.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31492 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
