rengolin added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D31417#713171, @huntergr wrote:

> The other alternative I thought of was to perform the filtering in 
> ParseOpenMP.cpp instead, but I need to figure out how to delete or skip 
> tokens there without cluttering up the rest of the OpenMP parsing.


That was my first thought, yes, but I'm not sure how invasive this could get.

> This feature comes from user requests, and basically matches the 
> functionality of other compilers (e.g. gcc).

Right, in this case, I think we have a stronger motivation to make that an 
integral part of the existing OpenMP parser.

cheers,
--renato


https://reviews.llvm.org/D31417



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to