Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?= <carlos.gal...@zenseact.com>, Carlos =?utf-8?q?Gálvez?= <carlos.gal...@zenseact.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128...@github.com>
carlosgalvezp wrote: > Will be better to use decorator pattern instead of ad preprocess consumer. > Most of clang-tidy check does not reply on ast matcher result in system > header. but it is maybe not suitable for static analyzer, especially for > non-std system header. Not sure I understand, can you explain in more detail what you mean by "decorator pattern"? What drawback do you see with the current implementation? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128150 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
