preames wrote: > I am kind of confused now. So the situation here is that RVIOS has already > implemented these vendor extensions in cores and RVIOS is also trying to make > these extensions official RVI standards, right?
You're confusing two things. We (Rivos) have defined a set of custom vendor extensions - this patch is the first in that sub-series. We are *also and separately* proposing a subset of instructions for consideration at RVI for eventual standardization. As an example of how these are different, see XRivosVisni in the linked repo. That's a vendor extension which relates to gaps identified in RVV, but for which we're not currently proposing an extension at RVI. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127694 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
