================
@@ -6910,6 +6910,10 @@ defm loop_versioning : BoolOptionWithoutMarshalling<"f", 
"version-loops-for-stri
 
 def fhermetic_module_files : Flag<["-"], "fhermetic-module-files">, 
Group<f_Group>,
   HelpText<"Emit hermetic module files (no nested USE association)">;
+
+def do_concurrent_parallel_EQ : Joined<["-"], "fdo-concurrent-parallel=">,
----------------
mjklemm wrote:

Shall we have a single option `-fdo-concurrent-parallel=` and have the decision 
of whether to use OpenMP or OpenACC via `-fopenmp` and `-fopenacc`?  
`-fdo-concurrent-parallel` does not make much sense without one of the latter 
options. I guess it's a matter of proper documentation.  If we have different 
flavors of this option, we would run into error cases that we'd have to handle 
such as `-fopenacc -fdo-concurrent-to-openmp`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126026
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to