================
@@ -40,17 +40,28 @@ enum class OpenVariant {
OpenAt
};
+static CachedMacroValue getCreateFlagValue(const ASTContext &Ctx,
+ const Preprocessor &PP) {
+ CachedMacroValue MacroVal("O_CREAT", PP);
+ if (MacroVal.hasValue())
+ return MacroVal;
+
+ // If we failed, fall-back to known values.
+ if (Ctx.getTargetInfo().getTriple().getVendor() == llvm::Triple::Apple)
+ return CachedMacroValue{0x0200};
+ return MacroVal;
+}
+
----------------
steakhal wrote:
I'd refrain from generalizing right away. If we see this pattern appear again,
we can think about concrete steps reducing the code duplication. So far I don't
think it's the time.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127409
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
