jinge90 wrote: > Normally we should not remove symbols for backward compatibility, but in this > niche case I am not sure anyone uses these CET function names, so I think the > rename is fine. Instead of `ss`, perhaps `shstk`? I agree that it's useful to > unify the naming on aarch64/riscv/x86 if they do end up being very similar. > > @john-brawn-arm @jinge90
It seems to be OK to rename since these functions are not intended to be called by users, they are just used internally in libunwind. Thanks very much. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126663 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
