brunodf-snps wrote: > I'm not qualified to review this, so please make sure you understand changes > to CWG158 test and they are what you expect. Specifically, I'd like to avoid > updating the test just to make FileCheck happy.
All the updates to FileCheck patterns match what I expected. The affected test case of cwg158.cpp was added by @fhahn in commit decb87452d8e3b93b21ab9e4c3dd03d85cbebfa5, I hope he will still chime in. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126047 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits