brunodf-snps wrote:

> I'm not qualified to review this, so please make sure you understand changes 
> to CWG158 test and they are what you expect. Specifically, I'd like to avoid 
> updating the test just to make FileCheck happy.

All the updates to FileCheck patterns match what I expected. The affected test 
case of cwg158.cpp was added by @fhahn in commit 
decb87452d8e3b93b21ab9e4c3dd03d85cbebfa5, I hope he will still chime in.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126047
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to