frasercrmck wrote: > There are a couple of things I thought I'd leave to the PR discussion, like: > > * Should we standardise the diagnostics a bit better? Specifically with > regards to whether the possibility of "vector" needs to be made explicit when > we say `a floating point type`, `an unsigned integer`? That's why I added `an > integer or vector of integers` but now it stands out. >
The latest version of this PR does just that. I've tried to split up the error diagnostic so that it's more modular. Downstream I needed a way of accepting a scalar or vector of 'int' which felt like the straw that broke the camel's back. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125673 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
