jhuber6 wrote: > I'm not sure if calling it `libomp.a` is a good idea. I personally find it > confusing because "libomp" is already an established name—it refers to the > OpenMP host runtime contributed by Intel, just as "libgomp" is the OpenMP > host runtime for GCC. These names are well-recognized. On the other hand, I > have no issue with continuing to call it `libomptarget.devicertl.a`. Other > than that, I think this is a great thing to have and a big step forward.
Sure, I can name it something else. Maybe we could just tall it `libomptarget.a`? I don't like the `devicertl` part. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126143 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
