================ @@ -1031,6 +1032,7 @@ void ExprEngine::removeDead(ExplodedNode *Pred, ExplodedNodeSet &Out, const LocationContext *LC, const Stmt *DiagnosticStmt, ProgramPoint::Kind K) { + llvm::TimeTraceScope TimeScope("ExprEngine::removeDead"); ---------------- necto wrote:
I have considered it thanks you your comment. I wasn't aware of it. Unfortunately, it has the following drawbacks: - it might be non-portable, which would cause a headache in the tests - it produces a full function signature, which I find too verbose for a label - it hides the real name of the time scope, which might make it slightly less clear On the other hand, I can use the [`__func__`](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/function#func) variable that is portable and short. Yet, it still suffers from the third, admittedly, rather small disadvantage, plus it omits the namespace and the class qualifiers, which I find would obscure the trace. However, it spares some repetition and protects against some C&P bugs. I have no strong preference one way or the other. Do you think I should use it instead? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125884 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits