================
@@ -4870,14 +4870,16 @@ def note_ovl_candidate_inconsistent_deduction_types :
Note<
"candidate template ignored: deduced values %diff{"
"of conflicting types for parameter %0 (%1 of type $ vs. %3 of type $)|"
"%1 and %3 of conflicting types for parameter %0}2,4">;
-def note_ovl_candidate_explicit_arg_mismatch_named : Note<
+def note_ovl_candidate_explicit_arg_mismatch : Note<
"candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified argument "
- "for template parameter %0">;
+ "for %ordinal0 template parameter">;
+def note_ovl_candidate_explicit_arg_mismatch_detail : Note<
+ "%select{"
+ "|: expected a type, but got value '%1'"
+ "|: expected constant of type %3 but got type %1"
+ "|: could not convert '%1' from %2 to %3}0">;
----------------
AidanGoldfarb wrote:
Noted, thank you. I definitely want to dig into the issue, but I am happy to
divert it to another PR per your advice.
I will revert the relevant cases to their original messages (or whatever we
determine the new default to be). For the test in `cwg3xx.cpp` that would be
`candidate template ignored: invalid explicitly-specified argument for 1st
template parameter` (the original unnamed case).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122754
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
