kinu wrote: Would the alternative that is discussed here mean we want to forward some attributes only when they are applicable, something like `clang::forwad_lifetimebound`?
Regardless, I think it'd be also good to agree on the use cases we want to support in a concrete code snippet (that should also answer to @Xazax-hun 's question). There could also be a question of whether we really should try to support variadic templates in the current lifetime-bound too, because we're aware that the current semantic itself has a limitation. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125520 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
