yronglin wrote: @cor3ntin @erichkeane Many thanks for the review!
> @yronglin Can you modify hasRebuiltInit() as follow and see if anything > breaks? (and if it works we don't need the bit) Sure, let me give a try. > It seems to me the static analyzer should be responsible for this perhaps, > and not the AST. Yeah, this function was only used in static analyzer now, maybe we can move it into static analyzer's code. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117437 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
