phoebewang wrote:
> > Let me know whether you are happy with this solution or not.
>
> Yes, thanks, I agree, this is better. Since we disable AVX10 version
> completely with any of options 256 or 512 (some kind of duplication), it
> means that we can't partially disable it, so these options doesn't make much
> sense.
>
> And some uncommon scenarios are also available e.g., to benchmark a function
> compiled with `avx10.2-256` in `avx10.2-512` context we need to use
> `__attribute__((target("no-avx10.1-512")))`. So basically `no-avx10.1-512` is
> an option to disable 512 bit instructions of AVX10 regardless of enabled
> AVX10.x
Yes, good point!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124511
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
