jbcoe added a comment. I think that clang-tidy allows case-specific subsetting of C++. It is said that C++ contains a beautiful language and I've found that definition of beauty to be very use-case specific. Checks for side-effect free, Haskell-like, functional code would be of enormous interest to some subsections of the C++ community ( financial asset pricing and risk) but of very little interest to others (device drivers for embedded code). It would seem an enormous loss to me to require all clang-tidy checks to be generally useful. It's a simple matter to define a clang-tidy config file to enable different checks in different parts of a code base.
Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D30896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
