dgg5503 wrote: Hi @steakhal ,
Thanks for providing such detailed answers to my questions! Given your response, I feel like the design of my implementation is on the right track, although feel free to critique it further when you have the chance. One thing I do need to look further into is applying this invalidation artifact to globals since, for my local loop-widening example, it doesn't seem to work. No worries on the review, I've been caught up in other things this past week too. I hope to get back to this PR this week or next. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122398 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
