rnk wrote: +1 to separating implementation from enablement. Enabling the warning by default will predictably generate pushback and folks may ask to revert, and it's a good best practice to be able to easily do that while leaving the implementation in place.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117622 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
