================
@@ -1212,6 +1212,14 @@ static void handlePreferredName(Sema &S, Decl *D, const
ParsedAttr &AL) {
<< TT->getDecl();
}
+static void handleNoSpecializations(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef Message;
+ if (AL.getNumArgs() != 0)
+ S.checkStringLiteralArgumentAttr(AL, 0, Message);
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
I'm not 100% sure what the correct thing to do is. I don't think there's harm
in adding the attribute without a string if the arguments are incorrect, since
they don't affect what the attribute does in a significant way. OTOH there
isn't that much benefit in adding it, since the program is ill-formed anyways.
@AaronBallman any thoughts on this?
P.S. why isn't `checkStringLiteralArgumentAttr` marked `[[nodiscard]]`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
