aaron.ballman added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/misc/MiscTidyModule.cpp:70
+    CheckFactories.registerCheck<ForwardingReferenceOverloadCheck>(
+        "misc-forwarding-reference-overload");
     CheckFactories.registerCheck<MisplacedConstCheck>("misc-misplaced-const");
----------------
xazax.hun wrote:
> malcolm.parsons wrote:
> > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > leanil wrote:
> > > > aaron.ballman wrote:
> > > > > I wonder if the name might be slightly misleading -- I've always 
> > > > > understood these to be universal references rather than forwarding 
> > > > > references. I don't have the Meyers book in front of me -- what 
> > > > > nomenclature does he use?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Once we pick the name, we should use it consistently in the source 
> > > > > code (like the file name for the check and the check name), the 
> > > > > documentation, and the release notes.
> > > > Meyers calls them universal references, but it's //forwarding 
> > > > reference// in the standard (14.8.2.1).
> > > Hmm, the terms are a bit too new to really get a good idea from google's 
> > > ngram viewer, but the search result counts are:
> > > 
> > > Google:
> > > "universal reference" : 270,000
> > > "forwarding reference" : 9650
> > > 
> > > Stack Overflow:
> > > universal reference : 3016
> > > forwarding reference: 1654
> > > 
> > > So I think that these are probably more well-known as universal 
> > > references, despite the standard's nomenclature being forwarding 
> > > reference.
> > The Q&A section in https://isocpp.org/files/papers/N4164.pdf explains why 
> > "universal reference" is a bad name.
> I think in a compiler related project at least in the source code we should 
> stick the the standard's nomenclature. In the documentation, however, it is 
> worth to mention that, this very same thing is called universal reference by 
> Scott Meyers. 
Okay, I'm convinced enough that "forward reference" is okay. :-)


Repository:
  rL LLVM

https://reviews.llvm.org/D30547



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to