================ @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-llvm -O1 -funroll-loops -mllvm -force-vector-width=2 -o- %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,UNROLL +! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-llvm -O2 -mllvm -force-vector-width=2 -o- %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,UNROLL +! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-llvm -O1 -fno-unroll-loops -mllvm -force-vector-width=2 -o- %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NO-UNROLL +! RUN: %flang_fc1 -emit-llvm -O1 -mllvm -force-vector-width=2 -o- %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NO-UNROLL + +! CHECK-LABEL: @unroll +! CHECK-SAME: (ptr nocapture writeonly %[[ARG0:.*]]) +subroutine unroll(a) + real(kind=8), intent(out) :: a(1000) ---------------- kiranchandramohan wrote:
Can this be an integer array to avoid the `uitofp` ? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122906 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
