================
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+ // Note the return value isn't used to return early
+ // to preserve the AST as best as possible even though an error
+ // might have occurred. For struct initialization it also allows
+ // all field assignments to be checked rather than bailing on the
+ // first error.
+ S.BoundsSafetyCheckInitialization(Entity, Kind, Sema::AA_Initializing,
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
Actually, wait, I just noticed that there are several places we do this. I
don’t remember off the top of my head, but is there any place where we actually
*do* check for the error? If we always ignore it everywhere, the function
should probably just return `void`, and the comment as to why we ‘ignore’ the
error should be on the function instead.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
