HerrCai0907 wrote: > > This check sounds a bit strange. Is this issue common in real-world > > projects, do we have some data? It's the first time I've heard of it. Why > > would people deviate from the standard signature for move constructors? > > It's anecdotal, but I've encountered it in a few places in a private > codebase. I don't think it's a _really_ common issue, but it'd be nice to > have a lint warning for this.
It may happen. Some C++ newer will follow blindly follow some coding guideline and add explicit for all constructor with only one parameter. And it is hard to detect to be honest since small performance issues are always hard to detect. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122599 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
