github-actions[bot] wrote: <!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning: <details> <summary> You can test this locally with the following command: </summary> ``````````bash git-clang-format --diff 4f4e2abb1a5ff1225d32410fd02b732d077aa056 ff22639d751a38e633a5b2e4fe42586d81b36499 --extensions cpp -- clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp `````````` </details> <details> <summary> View the diff from clang-format here. </summary> ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp index 1bab4efc75..a59f7108c0 100644 --- a/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp +++ b/clang/lib/Driver/Driver.cpp @@ -6099,10 +6099,12 @@ const char *Driver::GetNamedOutputPath(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA, llvm::PrettyStackTraceString CrashInfo("Computing output path"); // Output to a user requested destination? if (AtTopLevel && !isa<DsymutilJobAction>(JA) && !isa<VerifyJobAction>(JA)) { - // CL and not building a PCH. Not sure why the GNU-style driver doesn't need this. - // May need to rethink. - Arg *FinalOutput = IsCLMode() && !C.getArgs().hasArg(options::OPT__SLASH_Yc) - ? C.getArgs().getLastArg(options::OPT__SLASH_Fo, options::OPT__SLASH_Fo_COLON) + // CL and not building a PCH. Not sure why the GNU-style driver doesn't need + // this. May need to rethink. + Arg *FinalOutput = + IsCLMode() && !C.getArgs().hasArg(options::OPT__SLASH_Yc) + ? C.getArgs().getLastArg(options::OPT__SLASH_Fo, + options::OPT__SLASH_Fo_COLON) : C.getArgs().getLastArg(options::OPT_o); if (FinalOutput != nullptr) { `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121046 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits