erichkeane wrote: > I don't think it makes any sense for `__has_builtin` to return true when the > target does not in-fact have the builtin. Most of the time this is used to > guard target specific code, which will then be wrong if it's compiled on the > device. Realistically the solution that makes sense to me is to not emit any > of the aux target's builtins as available.
>From the user's perspective, the target DOES support the builtin though, since >from their perspective, their target is 'SYCL host + device'. So this is >actually not as clear as "it should never", because target/aux-target are >machinations of the implementation, and don't properly respect the user's >definition of 'target'. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121839 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
