farzonl wrote:

> I'd definitely suggest you reduce the scope - maybe always expand the 
> reduction serially in the frontend and not create the llvm intrinsic at all? 

Between @Il-Capitano  and @RKSimon comments I think it makes the most sense to 
do a sequential reduction in the frontend. Thats actually easier because we 
won't have to add SPIRV backend support for vec reduce. 


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120367
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to