alejandro-alvarez-sonarsource wrote: > Out of curiosity (not a blocking issue), why do you want this feature for > C++20 modules?
Sanitizers, linters and indexers have to deal with code using non supported C++ language features or extensions. This is also true for C++20 modules. While conceivably one may implement module support without going through the intermediate PCM, to keep the semantics close to what the compiler does, the most straightforward is to do what the compiler does and go throught the same codepath as when actually compiling 馃槂 And also, they would be able to not having to reparse everything and leverage one of the benefits of C++20 modules. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121550 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
