HighCommander4 wrote: In the latest update, matchers for the `DependentNameType` cases are revised to be more specific. Here, the approach I took was to match the context in which the types appear.
@hokein I believe your comment about using more specific matchers should be fully addressed now :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121313 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
