================
@@ -941,6 +941,19 @@ struct CounterCoverageMappingBuilder
return Counter::getCounter(CounterMap[S]);
}
+ std::pair<Counter, Counter> getBranchCounterPair(const Stmt *S,
----------------
chapuni wrote:
Done but I am still dubious namings would be appropriate. Not all users expect
`[Exec, Skip]`, but `[Exec, Exit]` or similar. Do you have a better idea to
resolve namings (not by structural assignments but by name)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112702
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
