================ @@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ def err_opencl_unknown_type_specifier : Error< def warn_unknown_attribute_ignored : Warning< "unknown attribute %0 ignored">, InGroup<UnknownAttributes>; +def ext_unknown_attribute_ignored : Extension< + "unknown attribute %0 ignored">, InGroup<UnknownAttributes>; ---------------- a-tarasyuk wrote:
No, I didn't. Should we address the following concern (maybe only for `c23`) by using a new group with `extension` handling? > With --std=c23, when using attributes with an arbitrary attribute-prefix, > Clang raises the warning -Wunknown-attributes The whole point of attribute-prefixs is to be able to use attributes for multiple compilers without a #ifdef-hell. Thus, there is no reason for this warning to be raised. And if a warning has to be raised, it should be a different one (perhaps -Wunknown-attribute-prefix) such that it can selectively be disabled (since -Wunknown-attributes is useful in case of misspelled attributes in general). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120925 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
