================
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -verify
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+template <int i>
+int g() {
+ return [] (auto) -> int {
+ struct L {
+ int m = i;
+ };
+ return 0;
+ } (42);
----------------
zyn0217 wrote:
I feel like this is some fallout of not decoupling instantiating lambda body
from the lambda transformation. If we had been able to avoid the body transform
when transforming the lambda for the call expression, we could also have
avoided instantiating an offending intermediate `L`, right? @erichkeane
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121225
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
