================
@@ -1018,13 +1018,19 @@ bool Darwin::hasBlocksRuntime() const {
}
}
-void Darwin::AddCudaIncludeArgs(const ArgList &DriverArgs,
- ArgStringList &CC1Args) const {
+void MachO::AddCudaIncludeArgs(const ArgList &DriverArgs,
+ ArgStringList &CC1Args) const {
+ if (!isTargetAppleBased())
+ return ToolChain::AddCudaIncludeArgs(DriverArgs, CC1Args);
----------------
carlocab wrote:
> But that's a good point, it would probably be cleaner to make an AppleMachO
> toolchain in between the existing MachO and Darwin ones
This does seem cleaner to me, but I can see how someone else might prefer the
opposite -- feel free to leave the `isTargetAppleBased` checks in if someone
else pushes back on an `AppleMachO` toolchain.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120507
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
