dyung wrote: > @dyung -- Could you try out > https://github.com/chandlerc/llvm-project/tree/shard-loongarch and see if > that works? > > Notably, it includes one additional patch on top of this series: > [chandlerc@2d59328](https://github.com/chandlerc/llvm-project/commit/2d593288dc18c55307779ae82a18d024761356ad) > > This won't be enough to fully resolve the issue, but if the LoongArch errors > go away with this patch, then it gives me a strong theory about what is still > going wrong and I can likely find a workaround for the rest as well.
Sorry for the delay, here are the results of running the branch shard-loongarch. Main takeaway is that the loongarch failures seem to have been fixed with the patch at the HEAD of that branch. I have uploaded the test logfile here (another 300MB file when expanded): https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8v8toveo8h45c4iuwjgo8/log_test.f6426abc224b140bfb3b6fdc45443bc4e16057aa.zip?rlkey=6rj3vygil705ddd63vk4ykqdl&dl=0 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120534 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits