dyung wrote:

> @dyung -- Could you try out 
> https://github.com/chandlerc/llvm-project/tree/shard-loongarch and see if 
> that works?
> 
> Notably, it includes one additional patch on top of this series: 
> [chandlerc@2d59328](https://github.com/chandlerc/llvm-project/commit/2d593288dc18c55307779ae82a18d024761356ad)
> 
> This won't be enough to fully resolve the issue, but if the LoongArch errors 
> go away with this patch, then it gives me a strong theory about what is still 
> going wrong and I can likely find a workaround for the rest as well.

Sorry for the delay, here are the results of running the branch 
shard-loongarch. Main takeaway is that the loongarch failures seem to have been 
fixed with the patch at the HEAD of that branch.

I have uploaded the test logfile here (another 300MB file when expanded):
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/8v8toveo8h45c4iuwjgo8/log_test.f6426abc224b140bfb3b6fdc45443bc4e16057aa.zip?rlkey=6rj3vygil705ddd63vk4ykqdl&dl=0

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120534
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to