================
@@ -2663,6 +2671,21 @@ def visitor(field, children):
conf.lib.clang_Type_visitFields(self, fields_visit_callback(visitor),
fields)
return iter(fields)
+ def get_bases(self):
+ """Return an iterator for accessing the base classes of this type."""
+
+ def visitor(field, children):
+ assert field != conf.lib.clang_getNullCursor()
+
+ # Create reference to TU so it isn't GC'd before Cursor.
+ field._tu = self._tu
+ fields.append(field)
+ return 1 # continue
+
+ fields: list[Cursor] = []
----------------
DeinAlptraum wrote:
Shouldn't `fields` be named differently here? E.g. `base_classes` or similar
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120300
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
