================ @@ -12408,6 +12408,29 @@ def err_sycl_special_type_num_init_method : Error< "types with 'sycl_special_class' attribute must have one and only one '__init' " "method defined">; +// SYCL kernel entry point diagnostics +def err_sycl_entry_point_invalid : Error< + "'sycl_kernel_entry_point' attribute cannot be applied to a" + " %select{non-static member|variadic|deleted|defaulted|constexpr|consteval|" + "noreturn|coroutine}0 function">; ---------------- tahonermann wrote:
Just "coroutine" is what is commonly used, though I do see a couple of cases of "coroutine function" (only one of which is user facing): ``` def note_coroutine_promise_call_implicitly_required : Note< "call to %0 implicitly required by coroutine function here">; ... def note_coroutine_function_declare_noexcept : Note< "must be declared with 'noexcept'" >; ``` I agree a change is warranted. That additional `%select` is pretty ugly, but I do see similar precedent, so ok. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120327 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits