================
@@ -6082,6 +6084,7 @@ TEST_P(ASTImporterLookupTableTest,
LookupSearchesInTheWholeRedeclChain) {
auto Res = LT.lookup(N1, Name);
ASSERT_EQ(Res.size(), 1u);
EXPECT_EQ(*Res.begin(), A);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(LT.lookup(N2, Name).empty());
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
So prior to your change this lookup would've found `A`? Because the
`LookupTable` would unconditionally use the primary context?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118466
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits