dlj added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372#688154, @mehdi_amini wrote:

> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372#687060, @ahatanak wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372#687054, @dlj wrote:
> >
> > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372#686871, @ahatanak wrote:
> > >
> > > > Have you considered using "include_directories" in CMakeLists.txt to 
> > > > avoid including "../Something.h"?
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't want to take that approach, and there's a specific reason why: my 
> > > concern isn't with three extra bytes, it's the fact that the headers are 
> > > in an unusual place. It's typical to include headers from a subdirectory, 
> > > or from the includes directory, but far less common to include from a 
> > > parent lib directory. Hiding that fact seems strictly worse to me.
> >
> >
> > OK. I was suggesting that only because LLVM already uses 
> > include_directories to include a header that exists in the parent directory 
> > in some cases. Apparently that's not what you wanted.
>
>
> Yes it seems "common" in LLVM to do this in CMake: `include_directories( 
> ${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/.. ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/.. )`


Actually, since I'm still keeping these files in the clangDriver rule, the 
lib/Driver directory is already on the search path, so I can use a subpath of 
Driver already.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to