yronglin wrote: > LGTM > > I'm a little concerned this is going to lead to other crashes due to exposing > more codepaths to "invalid" decls. But it seems like it's doing the right > thing in the given cases.
Yeah, if the PR breaks clang, I'll revert it quickly. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113049 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
