================ @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#ifndef __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__ +#define __CLC_INTEGER_CLC_CLZ_H__ + +#if defined(CLC_CLSPV) || defined(CLC_SPIRV) +// clspv and spir-v targets provide their own OpenCL-compatible clz +#define __clc_clz clz ---------------- arsenm wrote:
> In this context of this PR, what are you proposing? That no such redirections > should take place, or just that ones that map to intrinsics specifically > should not be redirected? I mean __clc_ functions should not be implemented by directly calling the opencl public name, that's backwards. Targets should be implementing __clc override implementations, not directly providing their own opencl public entrypoints. It sounds like that's the end goal, not sure how this step gets you there though. I won't hold this up if it's in service of reaching that end https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116786 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
