jh7370 wrote: > This has no effect in LLVM itself, which does not make use of this, but is > going to be used in DPC++'s libsycl. That is meant to be upstreamed at some > point, so it probably makes sense to get this into LLVM already and avoid > future conflicts.
I don't know what others would think about this, but without the subsequent changes that make use of this, I don't think this should be landed in LLVM. After all, plans might change, the community might refuse the subsequent PRs etc, resulting in dead code lying around. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118635 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
