AaronBallman wrote: > > Why should this live upstream if it basically only benefits a single > > downstream? > > This is a fair question, my intuition was that if the need came up multiple > times independently, it might be worth to have it upstream. But it is also > fair to wait until there is an actual upstream user, or multiple downstream > users. I am OK with closing this and keep it downstream until either of those > happens. The only risk is downstream users diverging, which is something we > can always deal with during the RFC process before something is upstreamed.
My (slight) preference is to keep this in the downstream until we have a need upstream (or multiple downstreams need it). WDYT @erichkeane? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117344 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
