vbe-sc wrote:

@erichkeane, @nikic This is the second version of this patch. I’m not entirely 
sure if my suggestion regarding the redundant assertion is correct, but I’d 
like to share some thoughts on the clang build time regression:

According to the actual implementation of `CXXRecordDecl::lookupInBases`: 

```
  // FIXME: This is an O(N^2) algorithm, but DPG doesn't see an easy
  // way to make it any faster.
```

My patch enforces additional lookups through the bases (as required by the C++ 
standard), so worse performance is expected regardless. It might be possible to 
limit this algorithm or improve its efficiency, but at the moment, I don’t see 
a viable way to achieve this.

Do you have any thoughts on the assertion I removed?

Do you have any suggestions or concern? Thanks

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118003
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to