hokein wrote: > Can you not remove the check-not. It makes sure we are matching all the > capture by attr.
I’m not sure they're necessary here. We’ve already verified that the relevant parameters have the attached capture_by attribute using CHECK-NEXT, I think it should be sufficient. The additional `CHECK-NOT` lines feel a bit noisy to me and can be confusing when updating this test. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118001 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
