hokein wrote: > It is possible that the temporary capturing object uses the captured entity > in its destructor.
This is a good point. We could potentially limit the suppression to cases where the destructor is trivial, but that might not be worth the added complexity. Agree that this is probably not a critical issue -- I just noticed it while reading the code. I’m fine with leaving it as is. I have repurposed this PR to add a test case for it instead. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117733 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
