================
@@ -535,6 +535,9 @@ static void visitFunctionCallArguments(IndirectLocalPath
&Path, Expr *Call,
bool EnableGSLAnalysis = !Callee->getASTContext().getDiagnostics().isIgnored(
diag::warn_dangling_lifetime_pointer, SourceLocation());
+ bool EnableDanglingCapture =
+ !Callee->getASTContext().getDiagnostics().isIgnored(
+ diag::warn_dangling_reference_captured, SourceLocation());
----------------
usx95 wrote:
I would not disable this based on new warning because:
1. This is not the warning that is triggered in this path.
2. We are considering both annotations as aliases in case of constructors. It
would be better to do this unconditionally.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117792
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
