mshockwave wrote: > Perhaps `__xray_default_options()` like `__asan_default_options()`? The user > would need to provide a `.o` that defines the function, but there is more > flexibility (e.g. the function can inspect a config file).
I think this will be a better idea. It simplifies the design and no longer requires changes in Clang driver and the additional LLVM Pass (i.e. XRayPreparation). I implemented that in #117921 and will close this PR in favor of that one. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116878 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
