================
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=%itanium_abi_triple -O1 -emit-llvm
-fextend-lifetimes -o - | FileCheck %s
+// Make sure we don't crash compiling a lambda that is not nested in a
function.
+// We also check that fake uses are properly issued in lambdas.
+
+int glob;
+
+extern int foo();
+
+struct S {
+ static const int a;
+};
+
+const int S::a = [](int b) __attribute__((noinline)) {
+ return b * foo();
+}
+(glob);
+
+int func(int param) {
+ return ([=](int lambdaparm) __attribute__((noinline))->int {
+ int lambdalocal = lambdaparm * 2;
+ return lambdalocal;
+ }(glob));
+}
+
+// We are looking for the first lambda's call operator, which should contain
+// 2 fake uses, one for 'b' and one for its 'this' pointer (in that order).
+// The mangled function name contains a $_0, followed by 'cl'.
+// This lambda is an orphaned lambda, i.e. one without lexical parent.
+//
+// CHECK: define internal {{.+\"_Z.+\$_0.*cl.*\"}}
+// CHECK-NOT: ret
+// CHECK: fake.use(i32
+// CHECK-NOT: ret
+// CHECK: fake.use(ptr
----------------
SLTozer wrote:
Not quite - as there are other functions in this file, the fake.uses could be
in a different function between the two that we have `CHECK-LABEL` directives
for; this could be done by adding more check lines for the other functions, but
I think this is _slightly_ simpler - happy to change it if you think otherwise
though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110102
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
