vtz wrote: > This is an LLVM code change, not a clang code change. It's an important > principle that we test LLVM at the smallest reasonable granularity. Can you > replace the clang test with an IR test? I'm sure we already have existing IR > carrying existing sections, we just need to test it with a new target.
@rnk this is also addressed with our new commit. Please refer to my comment above and quoted below: > I tried making a new test based on llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/clang-section.ll, > but it ended up equal so I added an extra RUN command to this test as well https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112714 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
