fhahn wrote: > This seems reasonable to me. Since it's standards-compliant, has a specific > opt-out flag, and is overridden by the general `-fno-strict-aliasing` flag, I > don't see any need for the RFC process. Still, you should definitely wait for > more feedback, especially from @AaronBallman. > > This is not a prerequisite for landing the patch — or a requirement at all, > for that matter — but I think it'd be great if you could make a sort of > capstone post on the forums talking about this work and your performance > analysis in more detail.
Thanks @rjmccall, I'll try to write something up, although it might take a few weeks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117244 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
