vabridgers wrote: Thanks @5chmidti for the constructive comments. I believe those have been addressed. I'll follow up after this PR is approved and merged to split the LIT appropriately. Thanks for understanding this approach, it was the only one I could think of where the reviewers could transparently observe all features were maintained from the older checker. I'll happily make any other suggested improvements if I've missed something. Best
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114715 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
